This help desk is a forum for questions and help on:
How to use Commons
Anyone, from newbie to experienced, can ask a question here. Questions will be replied to here as well. Any answers you receive are not legal advice and the responder cannot be held liable for them.
Resolved sections (marked by {{section resolved|1=~~~~}}) will be archived after two days. Sections with no discussion will be archived after ten days. The latest archive is Commons:Help desk/Archive/2024/12.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Kindly give me the copyright to use the following figure in my future textbook. From: https://en.wikipedia.org The diagram is shown in the following: file:///C:/Users/akendoush/Downloads/Sch%C3%A9maDechetsNucleaires_en.svg
Kendoush (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bastique: weird. Trying to work from his string (for a file on his hard drive) I must have done something wrong when I tried to access the file on Commons, then gotten it right when I typed it here.
You put a wrong information with the picture of Biden's family wedding picture. It should be Ashley Biden in the picture not Naomi Biden . Naomi Biden already passed away when she is 1 yr old 148.8.132.1516:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, if they are communists, surely the flag belongs to everyone.... However, here on Commons the burden of proof is on the uploader to insure that an image is not subject to copyright. This page seems to indicate that most of the images on the site are fair use, Commons requires that they be freely licensed, so probably not. Just Step Sideways (talk) 21:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This existsI checked the website of the party itself, and ironically these communists have copyrighted the entire site. We do already have at least two user-created images of the current flag though. Just Step Sideways (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there is any particular Communist antipathy to intellectual property rights, except insofar as they constitute the "means of production," which a logo does not. - Jmabel ! talk01:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, per COM:TOO Ireland, it appears that Ireland isn't using the sweat-of-the-brow rule in the United Kingdom, and this is complicated by a lack of cases. IMO might be on the verge of copyright protection?廣九直通車 (talk) 13:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, there is a B-class Wikipedia article that I'm doing on a particular South African subject and I will need to have about 7 pictures in the whole article, depicting the issues I'm writing about, including newspapers copies, cartoons, etc.
I have not been able to upload pictures that were not taken by me. Can someone please help me, I can send the list like links of the stuff that I wish up on my article. Anybody? ZS Khumalo (talk) 15:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, that will be so helpful. I appreciate. For example the pic contained in these article in the links below. I need to search for more other pics as I write the draft:
I see absolutely no reason to think that any of the images linked above are either in the public domain or free-licensed. @ZS Khumalo: do you have some reason to think any of these would be OK, or is this just shooting in the dark? - Jmabel ! talk04:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In reality I'm new here and I have no actual clue about public domains or licences, unless I'm taken through a guide that will show me which of all the WHICHES is which. The reason I was asking for assistance here for photo uploads uploads is because I truly don't know how to do Wiki Commons, my home is always Wikipedia. ZS Khumalo (talk) 04:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ZS Khumalo: I strongly recommend that if you are interested in uploading anything other than photos you took yourself and that do not show anyone else's creative work (e.g. paintings, texts, etc.), you should at least take 10-15 minutes to skim COM:L and en:Public domain. - Jmabel ! talk21:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The history of File:Mater Christi College, Belgrave.jpg will show that as recently as July '23 I was overwriting files uploaded by others. I like to think that this was constructive. Today, my attempt to replace the horribly dark File:May-Li Khoe and Federico Ardila.jpg with a GIMP-improved derivative got me the response "File overwriting not allowed / You attempted to overwrite a file that was not initially uploaded by you. You currently do not have sufficient permissions to do this." This surprised me. Have I misbehaved since July '23 and thus been kicked downstairs, or have the permissions allotted to users with given statuses been altered? (Or might it have been because I slightly cropped as well as lightened?) -- Hoary (talk) 00:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! Got it, Asclepias. So I'd have to be an autopatroller, something this says is for users "who create a high level of quality pages or uploads that do not require patrolling by other users" and also those "who make a large amount of good edits that do not need to be patrolled". If "a high level" means "a high quantity", that's most definitely not me; if it instead means"a high percentage", that, I hope, would include me. -- Hoary (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hoary: I'd say you're a little shy of the number of edits we'd usually want for autopatroller, but I can also see that you've done a lot of good work, including nominating a lot of copyvios for deletion. I'd support you if you want to nominate yourself for autopatroller; let me know. - Jmabel ! talk03:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When I try to upload the East German anthem, unconstructive, when I try to upload a better version of the Chechen anthem, unconstructive, when I try to upload the current Afghan anthem, unconstructive. What to do? Datawikiperson (talk) 09:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Datawikiperson: Hi, and welcome. I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/192 by trying to upload an mp3 file with insufficient rights. Too many people try to upload audio files that are still copyrighted by the authors, performers, recorders, publishing companies, etc. without proper licenses from those people. Please document fully the sources and licenses of your audio uploads, and request Autopatrol group membership at COM:RFR when you think you are ready (once you have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits); having that should allow you to upload mp3 files. In the meantime, please reencode that and other audio into Vorbis or Opus and upload them with full documentation as .ogg files. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My source claims to use the Creative Commons 4.0 International, and it asks for credit whenever possible. Also do you have to have 500 edits to upload mp3 files? Datawikiperson (talk) 12:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also keep in mind that if you wish to contribute information or files to the site that, unless you state otherwise, they must be able to be shared under the same license as well.” Have a great day! Datawikiperson (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, we'd like for those who upload mp3 files to understand the complexities of copyright of sound recordings because it's an area that so many get wrong. Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Datawikiperson: if you would provide links to the pages containing the relevant MP3s, I imagine someone here can follow through with uploading, if it is OK to do so. Question on the DDR national anthem, though: Hanns Eisler lived until 1962, wouldn't that anthem be copyrighted through 2032? Is there some particular German law waiving copyright because it was a national anthem? Similar question on the Chechen anthem, though in that case I personally know nothing about its authorship or about the relevant (presumably Russian) copyright law.
Complexities like that are exactly why we generally limit MP3 uploads to people who have done a fair amount of work here without getting in trouble: there are far more pitfalls for recordings than for images. - Jmabel ! talk18:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Varna Public Library has a collection of ~130 historic postcards by Grigor Paskov, depicting noteworthy places in Bulgaria (example item). These will enter the public domain in a couple of weeks, and I am preparing them for batch upload to Wikimedia Commons.
The library catalog includes subject metadata in Bulgarian, and I am trying to map these to appropriate Commons categories. My current thinking is to use an LLM like ChatGPT to guess the closest Commons category name from the Bulgarian terms, then manually review the results. Are there better tools, workflows, or recommendations for efficiently mapping subject metadata to Commons categories? atdt (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATDT (talk • contribs) 14:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Atdt: Not answering your question, but in addition to their copyright status in Bulgaria, please do not forget to indicate the copyright status of each postcard in the United States, e.g. "PD-US-expired" for postcards published before 1930 or possibly "Not-PD-US-URAA" for postcards published after 1929, such as the 1934 postcard in your example, unless they had been first published or published simultaneously in the United States. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I translated the text on an image into Greek. I want to upload the modified image, but the "Upload Wizard" gives me only two options: a) "This work was created by me and everyone is free to use it". b) "This work was created by someone else and it free to share". Well, I can't take the credit for it, just because I have changed a few words, but I can't make the original author responsible for my changes either. What shall I do? Aris Makridis (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aris Makridis: This question is probably to be understood primarily in relation to copyright. So, the first thing is to determine if you estimate that your translation generates or not a distinct copyright to your benefit. If yes, the modified work includes works from both authors and I suppose the answer can be either a or b, and you can adapt whatever might need to be adapted in the description page. If not, the answer would be b. (Or, maybe more smply, you can just avoid such problematic questions by not using the Upload Wizard for this type of situation. But you still have to indicate if you consider yourself one of the authors of the final work or not.) -- Asclepias (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original image is from the user LadyofHats and she has released it in the public domain. I do not claim any rights for the translation. I just want to make the correct attribution out of courtesy and at the same time take the responsibility for the changes. That's all. Aris Makridis (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aris Makridis: You can answer whatever you prefer to the Upload Wizard, what matters is what you actually write in the description page of the file. From what you said, I suppose that what you want to do is to indicate the author of the original, specify that you translated the text in Greek, and use the same PD tag as the original. Basically, the same things that you said here, but formatted to fit into the description page of the file. If you want, you can use the template "Retouched picture" to specify what you changed as compared to the original. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some things are basically not well handled with the Upload Wizard. You can either (1) do your best with the Wizard, then go back and edit the file page by hand or (2) use Special:Upload, copy-paste from the file page of the original you are working on, and edit accordingly either before or after uploading. - Jmabel ! talk18:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Medo199b: Hi, You can't. First on Wikimedia Commons, we only accept multimedia content, not articles. Then Wikimedia is not a social media, or a place to promote yourself. Please read the information on your talk page. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can upload files to the English Wikipedia at en:w:Special:Upload. This is a sister project to that site, so we can't answer much in the way of questions intended for there. I'd recommend you read w:en:WP:NFCC and if you still have questions, go to w:en:WP:TEAHOUSE. Local users there are very helpful and you can get help from members of that community (I am not presently one and can't be involved in internal issues there). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯03:42, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promotion of a University Page is Valid on Wikipedia with a Do-follow link?
I have a questions regarding the website url - https://onlinechitkarau.com/ that I want to promote these url via wikipedia pages, and have updated the university page as well. Do I need to create a seperate page for this particluar page? and can I promote content directly from my end. Rahulsharmancs (talk) 05:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks, I understand it is not good to promote on Wikipedia directly. Then what ways I can promote my content on the wikipedia as it is a valuable to me as i want to showcase information related to Online mba for working professionals. thank you @Aafifor your revert. Rahulsharmancs (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See for instance File:Messages Were Pasted over Light Switches in Portland, and Other Areas of the Pacific Northwest to Remind People of the Energy Crisis. This Same Message Was Used in Advertising in Newspapers and on Television 11-1973 (4271731073).jpg
The source URL is arcweb.archives.gov/arc/action/ExternalIdSearch?id=555429 but that's dead, the new URL being at catalog.archives.gov/id/555429
GOODMORNING,
I WOULD LIKE TO UPLOAD MY SCOTTISH BARONY TITLE AND COAT OF ARMS IN THE WIKIPEDIA ITEM "BARONAGE OF SCOTLAND". ALL TITLES ARE OFFICIALY REGISTERED IN THE BARONY REGISTER AND REGISTER OF SCOTTISH NOBILITY. MY COAT OF ARMS IS REGISTERED IN THE PUBLIC REGISTER OF ALL ARMS AND BEARINGS IN SCOTLAND. WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO PROCEED. I SEE THAT SEVERAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN ELABORATED BY AUTHOR KELLYCRAK88. DO I HAVE TO CONTACT HIM/HER..?
THANK YOU FOR RESPONDING.
KIND REGARDS
Hi, and welcome. Please stop shouting. You must create an account and login to upload. You may contact users by posting on their user talk pages. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Slartz: Hi, and welcome. How do you know that "It is a free use picture without any license"? Who snapped the picture? Who is the publisher? In what country or countries do they publish? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was taken by our Dutch publisher, 'MENLU', his name is Menno Ludriks and he snapped it for us. We just didn't publish it yet, so that's why I wanna use it now. Slartz (talk) 12:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Slartz: Per COM:Netherlands, The Netherlands joined the Berne Convention 1 November 1912. Since that date, every photo taken there was copyrighted the moment it was fixed in a tangible medium of expression (captured on a film negative or positive). Thus, we need permission via VRT. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The newspaper article would have to be freely licensed or public domain to be uploaded here. Keep in mind that you don't need to upload an article to cite it on Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless we are talking about something a hundred years old or so, the answer is probably "no", and that approaches certainty for most things in the last 70 years or so (though there are some weird exceptions). If you can't work out for yourself whether the article is copyrighted, please feel free to ask a more specific question. - Jmabel ! talk03:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this is the original file that I have uploaded creating it on the Paint.net - File:Telugu Desam Party Flag.png. Today, I have noticed that a similar creating was uploaded today by another user and claiming to be his creation in a different file with the same name adding 2024 at the end and in the same image format that is jpg. I am sure it's the exact copy of my creation. The copied file: File:Telugu Desam Party Flag 2024.png. How do I issue a copyright notice? Which template is used for the same? Please guide me. Thank you 456legend (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@456legend, the newer upload is a much larger file, in fact. It would be preferred to have the larger one over the smaller one, but we have no reason to delete either flag, it's acceptable to have multiple images of the same flags here on Commons. It is possible that the user used your image, made it larger, and cleaned it up, and should be crediting you, but there's no way to be certain about that. Bastique☎ let's talk!02:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Using Windows, I need to upload groups of photos of the same subject, so the categories and descriptions will be the same, and the name will be the same except for a sequence number.
I used to use Vicuna for this, but I can no longer get it to work. I was advised to download the vicuna zip file, go to the bin folder and run the vicuna.bat file. When I do this, Windows doesn't like it, but I tell it to run anyway. Then a command line screen comes up for a fraction of a second, then disappears, without doing anything.
Is there a way to get Vicuna to work? Is there a Windows alternative that does the same thing?
I need something like an EXE or BAT file to run. I can't run Python code. If I am taken to a list of folders on something like GitHub, I am completely baffled.
Do you start the vicuna.bat file from the file manager by clicking the mouse? Try opening a command shell and enter vicuna.bat from the prompt. You will either see the actual error message, or the program will ask you for some input parameters to run.
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: cuploader/frames/FIntro has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.checkAndLoadMain(Unknown Source)
I don't know what to do about that. Bubba73 (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I just tried uploading a photo that is mine that I wish to add to Barbara Weisberg's Wikipedia entry. I used the upload wizard but the error I received said: it could not be determined if the file was suitable. I spent hours trying to figure out what the problem is but I guess I need a very specific explanation for that file if you are able to help. I would very much appreciate it. The filename is barbaraweisbergphoto. JoClarke100 (talk) 14:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When you say "a photo that is mine" do you mean you took the photo and own the copyright, or do you mean something else? I ask because I see we are Commons:Deletion requests/File:DavidBlack.jpg still trying to sort out the status on an earlier photo that you claimed as "own work" but 2 days ago wrote "The photo was taken by his wife in their home," and said you would sort it out through VRT. I assume that you have not yet done that, since the file page is not marked with {{Permission pending}}. (I also wonder about your assertion that the photo was taken on the day you uploaded it; please make sure to be accurate about that as well.)
I'm not expert on these logs, and I'm not sure what tool you used to try to upload. If you used something other than Special:UploadWizard here on Commons (e.g. if you were cross-wiki uploading from the English-language Wikipedia) and if you took the photo yourself, then please try Special:UploadWizard. If you did not take the photo yourself, please be more careful to accurately describe your uploads in terms of authorship and date, and to go through the COM:VRT process for third-party materials (and, again, use Special:UploadWizard).
@Jmabel: The page linked from the "details" link in the filter log provides information, e.g. in this case the upload attempt was with the Upload Wizard. The triggered filter is for small files by accounts with less than 25 edits. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The filename extension was jpg. I should have included it. At this point, I have removed the photo of David Black; I believe the second Barbara Weisberg photo never made it in. I will address this issue when I have more time. I really appreciate your comments. The more important concern is the article on David Black - hoping it gets approved this go-round. JoClarke100 (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JoClarke100: Was "File:BarbaraWeisbergPhoto.jpg", that you attempted to upload on 20 December 2024, the same photo, maybe of a smaller size, as File:BarbaraWeisberg.jpg deleted on 17 December 2024? If so, please do not upload multiple copies of a file. When the problem is settled, the existing file can be undeleded. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to update the page for Northrup Field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Field because the image in the info box is not of the same Northrup Field that the article is subject of. I couldn't find a good image existing on wikimedia, but I found this (https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll175:4519) on the University of Minnesota library's website. It was taken in 1904, so from my understanding it should be public domain. Am I correct in assuming this, and is this image okay to upload to wikimedia for use on wikipedia? Mitchp10 (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete the following file TGD cover.jpg. I designed it and would like to upload it again and insert it into the article on "Satan from the seventh grade" Korntrans (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do I overwrite the article and add the image. When I want to upload it know there is a warning the image is already uploaded in wiki files and I cannot add it to the article. Korntrans (talk) 13:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a really confusing. It sounds like you are not doing the best process to do this. As Korntrans says, this is your file, so you can simply overwrite it.
Go to File:TGD cover.jpg. Near the bottom of the page (under the File History) you will see a link captioned "Upload a new version of this file". Click it. Upload your replacement file. That should then appear in the article (though there may be a delay due to caching).
Also: for this sort of thing, it is probably wise to go through the COM:VRT process to get a ticket that clarifies that you are, indeed, the author of the image. - Jmabel ! talk18:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WinninginJapan1999: This appears to be an account created only 3 minutes before you posted this here, so I have no idea what to make of "the admins and the filter keep brushing me off!" It does look like in that three minutes a filter prevented you from creating Category:Diagrams of speed limit signs, which would have nothing to do with creating a gallery page. Can you tell me how this would differ from the existing Category:Diagrams of speed limit road signs?
Thank you! I will keep that page in mind for future uploads as I was previously not aware of which license exactly were allowed and which were prohibited. 2003LN621:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I got a dataset from IMF website, say [1]. According to their website it is free to use their data so long the data are not tampered with and a citation from where the data came from [2]. Now *I* made a figure (plotting and adding explanation etc) based this dataset, and I want to upload this figure. Making the figure is my work and I do not seek any copyright. However, it is not clear what licence I should use given that the dataset is from IMF. Please advice on how to proceed, I do not frequently do this (uploading figures) so forgive my ignorance. Thank you in advance. A.Cython (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Cython: I guess I assumed more experience than you have, my apology.
When I said "using CC-BY" I meant a current version of the CC-BY license, not one that has been outmoded for over a decade, but I can see how you got confused when I didn't spell that out. Also that "subst" thing you did makes no sense at all. I can not edit a license for you in this case, because I can't license it on your behalf. Could you please replace {{self|subst:Custom license marker added by UW}} {{CC-BY}} with {{CC-BY 4.0|attribution=[[User:A.Cython|A.Cython]], using IMF data from https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/GRC/EURO/EU}}. - Jmabel ! talk06:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for helping me. No worries. I have been working mostly on Wikipedia articles but never really added images (I think I added a few before the Wiki Commons even existed), which is a different beast, so it is like I am starting from the beginning. A.Cython (talk) 17:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear, how can I change the name of an uploaded picture?
I uploaded the picture "PatrickRobertMartens.jpg" but the name has to be changed into "PatrickRemiMartens.jpg".
How can I do this?
Gr.
SumMus235711 SumMus235711 (talk) 12:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SumMus235711: you can make a move request. There should be a "move" tab, typically on the top nav of every file page (though some skins may place it differently). Since you are not a filemover, what this will do is to make a request for a filemover to move it.
Alternatively you can use {{Rename}}, but the move tab should do a better job of guiding you through the necessary steps.
I have added a number of derivative images that need more information in order not to be deleted. I would like to claim 'fair use' along with listing the source. Please help to do this properly so that the images are not removed. Images add so much important context, and so many either don't know how to upload images or all of them are owned by private corporations at high fees. Help me to make the proper 'fair use' claim so that the images can be retained.ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks - unfortunately, usually institutions and corporates own most of the images.
I think what I will start doing is adding a link to images under External links. That seems to be the only way to make the image part of the Wikipedia record in most of these cases. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the head of the cane of one Frederick Abberline, (8 January 1843 – 10 December 1929), British chief inspector for the London Metropolitan Police. He carved what he considered the likeness of Jack the Ripper into it.
Hallo ik probeer een aanpassing de maken in de pagina van voetbalclub de Volewijckers. Het logo klopt niet meer. Na het ongedaan maken van de fusie is het oude logo gebruikt voor een herontwerp. Ik heb gebruikt de nieuwe te uploaden maar dat lukt niet.
Graag contact
Fred van Mourik Fredvanmourik (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have a Wikimedia page with a JPG file that is larger than 100Mb. I want to post a replacement image, but I can't figure out how. I originally uploaded it using "Upload Wizard", but when I click on "Upload a new version of this file" I get taken to an "Upload file" page that doesn't allow uploads greater than 100Mb. So how do I upload a replacement JPG that's larger than 100Mb? Pixel8tor (talk) 02:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pixel8tor: I'm not sure where Upload Wizard enters into what you are describing, so I might be misunderstanding you.
If I understand correctly, you are trying to overwrite an existing file. May I assume you want to overwrite a file you initially uploaded? In general, there are very few cases where you should overwrite someone else's file, and my guess is that your account does not have the privileges to do that.
Assuming I've got that right: on the file page for the file you want to replace, right next to "Upload a new version of this file" it should say "(chunked upload)". Click on the latter, not the former, to upload a file over 100Mb. - Jmabel ! talk06:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick reply. You are understanding me correctly, I want to replace one of my uploads. Unfortunately, there is no "(chunked upload)" link next to "Upload a new version of this file" on my screen. To be clear, I do see the "Upload a new version of this file" link, but there is *no* "(chunked upload)" link. Pixel8tor (talk) 12:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well I thought it was working but at the end I'm getting this error "FAILED: abusefilter-warning: ⧼abusefilter-warning-overwriting-artwork⧽". And the image is stuck in my Stash. So how do I prevent the "overwriting artwork" error? And is there a way to publish the file from the Stash, or is that file unusable? Pixel8tor (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday, I uploaded 11 .ogg audio pronunciation files for our Википсалълъэ (Kabardian Wiktionary) (for example, гу379гупщэ.ogg). Although the system said that the file had uploaded correctly in the first stage, apparently the control information was not recorded properly in the second. Unfortunately, I didn't write down the message, but I believe it was something about a border violation. Now the command doesn't work for this file and I am unable to use it in the dictionary. Furthermore, I am unable to upload a replacement file under a different name. I merely get the message that it is identical to an existing file. How should I proceed with these files? I tried other files today and everything seems to be working correctly again... Rhdkabardian (talk) 10:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The current policy of Commons does not allow uploading files in NEF format, so I currently uploaded it to Google drive. Can you upload a high quality converted free-form image, thanks! Also licensed under CC-BY-4.0. Thanks! Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the previous answer about not using Getty Images, even if public domain. However, what if I purchase the image in question? I noticed that (1) some of the licenses allow for noncommercial use upon purchase (including for educational purposes and (2) there is also an option to license the image to another entity altogether (e.g., Wikimedia??). Please confirm, thank you in advance! Zurkhardo (talk) 16:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zurkhardo: That's most probably not OK, unless the image is in the public domain for some other reason. Noncommercial licenses are not allowed on Commons. Yann (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being one purchaser of a license to the image does not give you the right to relicense it, any more than owning a copy of a book lets you do the same. - Jmabel ! talk18:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]